|
Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
|
|
11-13-2011, 05:41 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
I'm interested in Web 2.0 submissions to multiple sites, SE nuke X in particular. I just didn't want to clog up Vita's thread with questions.
I want to know if you think blasting out articles to web 2.0 sites could be dangerous. I have several manually created web 2.0's that are great for my rankings. I don't want to endanger my older web 2.0's for the sake of SEneke blasts. But I want to do SEnuke blasts. I have no problem with the price of SENuke X. I have no problem with the fact that some of my SE Nuke blogs might get deleted. But I have several manually created blogs that seem to be golden. They're posts get indexed instantly, and they're great for serps. Some posts even rank on the first page for long tails. I was just wondering if links to a certain site would alert staff to other sub domains that link to the same sites. I just had a couple WP syndicator blogs deleted. I also ordered a round of links from a SENuke blast. And many have been deleted, the others are hard to get indexed. I want to make blogs that have multiple posts, and make them for the long term. Can I re-post to the same blog? I just want to do work that doesn't get deleted. Any thoughts? Time is Money...Author Unknown |
|||
|
11-14-2011, 01:11 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
Just to add something. I've read that the SEnuke X software will often include the {} squiggly lines in the posts. This would surely be a tell tale sign to site admins.
But this thread was a few months old, so maybe it's fixed now. Has anyone seen this? Time is Money...Author Unknown |
|||
|
11-14-2011, 04:42 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
the safest way to use SEnuke is by creating accounts and post UNIQUE content on all of those web 2.0 platforms WITHOUT adding any outbound links. You could perhaps do this again a couple of days later. Leave it for a week and start adding new content with backlinks. This is the safest and the best way to make sure that you keep your accounts alive.
:: internet marketing blog ::Tools I use: My brain! ![]() Thanks to Vita Vee I work now as a full time SEO project manager, so can you! |
|||
Thank given by |
mpw45233, gproxy |
|
12-22-2011, 10:09 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
Don't touch your original content Web 2.0 sites...instead create a test site and see what happens. When you see that that site got deleted or penalized you'll find your answer. If the other thing is working so far, you can do one post per day using what you were doing before. I've never used SEO Nuke, but it's software, I'm sure and software tends to go overboard for the best results.
|
|||
|
12-23-2011, 09:20 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Is Web 2.0 Automation Dangerous?
(12-22-2011 10:09 PM)essentials2IM Wrote: Don't touch your original content Web 2.0 sites Not quite sure what you mean here. Do you mean to not post original content to web 2 sites? Ultra Spinnable Articles | SEONuking | Commission Vantage | Rip Curl Commissions | Affiloblueprint |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)






Thank given by
