Easy Way to Find Best Adwords

[emarlow]

This is a great tool, but it has some out of the box problems. The main problem is you can't assume if GCD shows someone bidding on a keyword for a long period of time like 30-90 days. Their is a way around this problem, but it's not automatic. You must find domains that have tracking codes in their destination url and should only have one keyword for each url. Only when you filter the data in this way, can you be relatively certain the advertiser is profitable after 30-90 days of consitent bidding.

[hashimarketing]

Anybody got any ideas on a good way to boost your quality scores?

---

Thanks for the info...i'll try it out right now

[SEO_going]

(06-20-2009 03:48 PM)Vita_Vee Wrote:  

(06-19-2009 09:09 PM)chilty Wrote:  What IS a good quality score? Mine seem to be around 5-7 for various keywords. Is this goood, bad, or indifferent?

7 is a great score.

You can see a textual representation of your keywords quality score in your adwords account. Here are the steps to follow (taken from the adwords help section):

Quote:To find a representation of your keywords' Quality Scores in your account statistics:

1. Sign in to your AdWords account at https://adwords.google.com.
2. Select the appropriate campaign and ad group.
3. Click the Keywords tab.
4. Click Customize columns at the top of the ad group table.
5. Select Show Quality Score from the drop-down menu.
6. Click Done when you're finished. Each keyword's Quality Score will be described as 'Poor,' 'OK,' or 'Great.'

Hi Vita,

I recently watched a video from Ryan Diess where he talked about adding keyword related descriptions for images on a webpage, and using number descriptions, such as 1 ,2, 3 etc for arrows, logos, etc. so that these images would not be included in the Google Quality Score. Are you familiar with this approach?

[Vita_Vee]

(10-04-2009 08:58 PM)SEO_going Wrote:  Hi Vita,

I recently watched a video from Ryan Diess where he talked about adding keyword related descriptions for images on a webpage, and using number descriptions, such as 1 ,2, 3 etc for arrows, logos, etc. so that these images would not be included in the Google Quality Score. Are you familiar with this approach?

Hi SEO_going

I'm always using keyword descriptions for my images, that helps a lot, especially when a google searcher searches for images. For example if you search for "the elevate blueprint" on google and click on the images link at the top you will find 3 images pointing to my review:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&um...i=&start=0

For PPC, I have tested this in the past in some of my landing pages. While using keyword descriptions for the related images helps, I haven't experienced any benefit from using numbers for the non related images (like the arrows, header etc...)

VV

[dejvim]

(06-16-2009 05:10 PM)costas Wrote:  Well guys i just found the dream tool on spying over the Adwords competition on Google
It's called Chris Carpenter's Google Cash Detective and it is a really effective tool

GCD uncovers *EXACTLY* which keywords, ppc ads, affiliate programs
and bidding strategies are already pulling in *PROFITS* for
affiliates.
you can try it out for a free trial here

this is my refferal link and i would really appreciate if you'd use it .I honestly start trying it and i can not give it the best review yet , but i am really convinced that is a great tool .
Hope you will find it usefull
All the best
Costas

Ok, i'll give it a go .. and yes i have used your link,
Cheers

[maksimple]

This is a great tool, but it has some out of the box problems. The main problem is you can't assume if GCD shows someone bidding on a keyword for a long period of time like 30-90 days. Their is a way around this problem, but it's not automatic. You must find domains that have tracking codes in their destination url and should only have one keyword for each url. Only when you filter the data in this way, can you be relatively certain the advertiser is profitable after 30-90 days of consitent bidding.